", "The new RX1R II achieved an excellent DxOMark score of 97 points, with individual scores of 25.8 bits for color sensitivity, a wide 13.9 EVs dynamic range at base ISO (albeit slightly lower at base than the best tested), and a very good low-light ISO score of 3204 ISO." That’s not ideal for fleeting moment shots of the kind that street photographers specialize in. I never said anybody else should agree. My RX100 for instance has never had a firmware update issued I know of but then it really didn't need one. I’ve thoroughly enjoyed reading this review, as it has made me all the more confident in my plans to purchase of a Fuji X100F for less than half the price. And that’s when I think one should factor in the cameras’ other qualities which impact usability (battery life, ergonomics, etc.). (Sarcasm :) ). Time to radio in: we're gonna need a bigger card. lol (i'm impressed how you love that word). "The problem with the RX1r II is that it is focus by wire and there are no focal length markings, making zone focussing near impossible.". Ex-Microsoft CEO killing all lines of product and selling out to Microsoft with shaky and unproven mobile OS had nothing to do with Nokia downfall, nothing at all. You shoud try it!You could also try Fuji X100F, that now has 24mp (allowing some crop) and have a better iso performance than GR. Fujifilm's GF 63mm F2.8 R WR was the first lens to come out for the medium format GFX system, but we've slapped it on a GFX 100 to see how it stands up to 100MP of resolution. :-). And because the engineering challenges are steep and the market is relatively small, they've always commanded a price premium over mass-market point-and-shoot and SLR cameras. RX1R II does not resolve what the sensor resolves since none of E-mount lenses do that and RX1R II clearly has worse lens. Yes but even with that grip Sony A7R II is not as comfortable as Nikon's or Canon's with larger lenses and without a vertical grip.I wish Sony matched camera and optics better. And the downsides are less tolerance for camera shake (the original was great for very steady shooting but also good for a more run and gun kind of street shooting that I do a lot of - 42mp is less forgiving for the latter), the heavy overhead for storage space and processing the raw files, and I gotta think all of that resolution and the processing needed to harness it has something to do with the even worse battery life than the original. I've found this lack of continued support truly disappointing for a camera at this price point. Storage space can be solved by losslessly compressing the Raws, that actually makes the 42MP files smaller than uncompressed Raws from a 24MP sensor. Photo by Carey Rose; ISO 800, 1/125 sec, F4, If you're a fan of lens flare, you're in luck. If you want to take pictures of wallpaper, it's not the camera for you. If everybody would refuse to pay these exorbitant prices then the cost would come down but there's a sucker born every minute. But on a small camera like this (and even my Panasonic GX80) it is too easy to touch the screen inadvertently - so I just always have the touch capability disabled, it provides little benefit for me. So from that point of view even A7R II is not yet the ultimate sharpness benchmark but we have no better right now ON THE SAME SENSOR and RX1R II loses in sharpness. I have an RX1R & can certainly avow that the Carl Zeiss 35mm f:/2.0 lens is an amazing piece of sharp glass. It sucked. There is a high degree of customizability though - two function buttons, the AEL button, and the four-way controller are all reassignable. Works fine for me. I think this is the perfect companion to its big sister ! Since you like to quote DXO so much I will leave you with this. Don't bother responding as Utterlyotter posted you will just be showing your colors even more. The image looks as soft as the image on A7R II with 24-70 F4 lens that has optical resolution of 15 megapixels as measured by DXO. This is just a stupid statement. What’s the best camera costing over $2500? The Leica Q has image stabilization, but it's disabled by default because it might negatively impact sharpness. The resolution was shocking. Our theory is that in S-AF, the camera uses a combination of its CDAF and PDAF systems, using PDAF to get near the point of focus, and CDAF to fine tune it. I am sorry you did not see any better in this life yet. I reckon it is poor quality optics on RX1R II as that is what is different. But in real-world use, the RX1R II does have its frustrations. Click to read more in-depth coverage of body and design, controls and performance. With great image quality, impressive speed and powerful features, it's a compelling option that doesn't require a monthly subscription. Fujifilm's latest X-S10 is a likeable mirrorless camera with some of the company's best tech packed inside, and it doesn't cost the earth. That was a rather stupid assumption to make on your side. The main reason that you have that belief about smartphone cameras is because few give you access to the RAWs, so you're stuck with whatever noise reduction and processing they give you. DPR repeat this statement a few times. Just reread your comments, carefully. Before I got this camera the lack of IS was a real worry. Slips into coat pocket. Your "hate" Nikon for their poor live view implementation? I'm going to have to save my pennies for this beauty! and you still replied the same way I wastrying to avoid. Cropping got even better. I use it in "real world" shooting, without any trouble, just like I used to do with my old M5 : two hands and eye in the viewer. The sensor is the same but optics are not. You can also find the additional questions and answers concerning some particular features of the RX1R II. It's not a camera for just anyone. Can confirm: RX1RII is a terrible manual focus experience. This is a miniature MF class camera what you use to make large prints. But for others, they are deal breakers. It also has a price to match. As well you say, the DxO team have not teated this lens yet, so why quote the outgoing combo' ? Probably not gonna happen though, is it? Think of the huge popularity of quality fixed-lens cameras like the Kodak Retina and its ilk, Yashica Electro 35, or Canonet QL17. Film-enthusiast website Studio C-41 takes us on a tour of the Kodak film plant in Rochester NY, with some behind-the-scenes footage of how film is made. We're glad you asked. That is a few pixels wide on 42 megapixel sensor. The good news is that for most purposes, you'll be fine shooting in compressed Raw mode with somewhat more manageable ~40MB file sizes. ;-) Good luck in your personal adventures! But I suspect that setting this camera up for zone focusing will be difficult due to its poor ergonomics and menus. It fits in my kit next to an RX10 III (would have been the Nikon DL24-500 for the PDAF, but alas, no). Batteries are cheap and small. Or you may just be trolling i guess that could be a third option.Would you agree in this day and age people are more likely to bitch about something online than take the time to praise it?So if you go with this premise take a look a B&H for just one example. I think if a serious bug was found they'd fix it - I found their service with the light leak issue very good - the store phoned me and swapped it in 2 days flat. We created four polls, covering lenses and cameras, including more than 50 products in total. This is almost as hilarious as DXO's mark on the RX1-R that scored substantially lower than the original RX-1, which in 2 words is both LAUGHABLE & IMPOSSIBLE!..DXO's ratings are, by the way, the industries greatest joke! RX1 is ultracompact, RX100 is infracompact; what is compact then? Can't help but the picture of the man and the dog (which is nice by the way) is totally noisy @ISO 125. The Sony Cyber-shot RX1R began shipping in the U.S. market in July 2013, ... Nikon Z7 II First Shots Canon 1DX Mark III Preview Top Sony Cameras. In use, it is generally swifter than Fujifilm's X100T, if not quite as fast as the Leica Q. or you could simply half-press the shutter button to return to shooting mode, then zoom. The dials are great, but the buttons are mushy. No. You are the only one claiming there are "poor optics" in this camera. No, it doesn't have 4K video. Coming from manual focus: Leica M and Mamiya 7 and a Sony a7R with a Zeiss ZM 35mm f2.0, and of course the Leica manual lenses. I've done this a few times with A7s (the fist one, which has no IBIS) and the 55mm 1.8: at the night, wide apertures (harder to get the focus right) and speeds between 1/125 and 1/250 and the number of "not-sharp" images were less than 10%. Would be awesome if DPR could provide some sort of a clarification on this.. lets not keep our hopes to high though, haha:). The lens is actually very good. Does this camera have any image stabilization? Add the economic Sony 28mm f2, an excellent lens which is also very small...Or, if as Ray Sachs suggests, 24 mp is enough, then the A7ii with the 28mm f2; both have IBIS for hand held shooting; or, if you want half frame, the A6000 (now $500) plus the sony 28, even smaller (but no IS with this lens.). For A7R II that means larger camera with full grip. It has the same sensor as A7R II but very poor optics. However, the only adjustments I can find for the EVF is brightness and color temperature. Also a fair point. I will like to see in some comparisons a portrait for skin tones, a close-up/macro for details, a high contrast scene for shadows, a low light for noise... And maybe to put there Sony 7RII, Canon 5DSR and Nikon D810 to see what you miss if you have a compact FF camera. The point being that Sony do not consider the shutter on the a7R to be good enough to give it a year's warranty, which you'd normally expect. People who buy it are not looking for interchangeable lenses. Seems inevitable. US manufacturer Really Right Stuff just released a new lightweight travel tripod, aimed at active and weight-conscious photographers that don't want to compromise on quality. Thank you for propping argument that RX1R II has poor optical quality lens. In this buying guide we've rounded-up several great cameras for shooting landscapes, and recommended the best. Regarding the zoom issue, I have the RX100M4 and after taking a photo I'd zoom to recompose the next shot and find that I'm zooming in the last photo I took.This was annoying enough that I disabled the preview function.This fixed the problem. P.S. Read more, DPReview Editor Barney Britton has put some miles on the Sony Cyber-shot RX1R II, shooting it all over Western Washington and even bringing it to the Arctic Circle and back. What is ultracompact supposed to be? Sony RX1R II review – Introduction & features At a glance. It is only ISO performance, dynamic range and depth of color - that is what DXO does for cameras. I've sold all of my Canon cameras and accessories and am currently saving up for a Leica Q. What's more, the dynamic range allowed me to pull plenty of detail out of the foreground shadows. I think I got it.But it's important to clarify that it's not the ideal street camera for the way YOU shoot. It's not like it costs them $250 to make. When you plug the camera in to charge via the micro USB cable, there’s no light on the camera to indicate it’s actually charging. Even on the medium format side, the Fuji fixed G(x)645 series or newer fixed GF670 cost a small fraction of their interchangeable lens cousins. No IBIS, exorbitant pricing and lack of updating the 35/2 to something even marginally faster headline my disinterest. Sigma's 35mm F2 DG DN designed specifically for mirrorless cameras is a compact, well-built lens that produces lovely images. But even A7R II does not yet have lenses that fully match its resolution and hopes are only for upcoming G Master lens line up. Click to read more in-depth coverage of lens performance. Should you need it, though, when enabled, the OLPF does an excellent job of keeping moiré to a minimum. The Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX1R II puts an incredible high-resolution full-frame image sensor and fixed lens into a form factor that's almost pocket friendly. The. It's noticeably slower (and noisier) than say the 35mm F2.8 on the A7r II but at least it doesn't close down the IRIS in APS-C mode, like both the A6300 and A7r II do.The MF experience is bad. Natuurlijk kun je ook een minicompact inzetten, maar dan mis je twee belangrijke dingen. It is soft at F2.0 and needs to be stopped down to F4.0 to achieve similar sharpness as the RX1RII at F2.0. Categories: Compact Cameras, Reviews Tags: Sony, Sony RX1R II … It will now make it easier for travelers to legally fly. But I had a lot of out of focus images where I aimed for impromptu shots of my kids etc. Dust particles are really small, and manage to sneak into everything... Wouldn't dust on a small, high pixel density sensor cause the loss of more pixels than a large lower pixel density sensor. I was shooting last week and it was so cold that I couldn't take off my mittens to get at my gloves so I could take them off to use the touch screen on my camera. ;). Optics on this camera do not fit the sensor resolution. It will be nice to see a comparison between RX1R and RX1R2, side by side, in real world, with some crops, to see the difference. Check out our sample gallery and decide for yourself. Announced just a few weeks ago, the Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX1R seems to be the perfect union between two of the biggest trends in digital camera technology. Isn't smartphone image quality 90% as good as an RX100's by the same token? RX1RII has electronic image stabilization for videos only. The AF of the Q is also faster and the 24 MP is more suited to run and gun street work than the Sony.Also, the Q has an electronic shutter that kicks in giving much higher shutter speeds than the Sony, which is limited to 1/4000s. I have no issues with using the control wheel. If you are saying it is class leading you must not have seen truly good lenses from Sony's competition. Hmmm. Download some Raws and see what you can do with them. Couple that with Eye-AF and face detection that both work beautifully, as well as little to no hunting in low light due to the decisiveness of phase detection, and the RX1R II is a pretty powerful package. After reading about this camera’s poor battery life, slow startup and buffering times, poor AF in dim light, poor ergonomics, and frustratingly convoluted menu system, I wouldn’t consider it such a no-brainer - particularly given its outlandish price. What's the best camera for travel? I wonder with all the financials issues that Sony has from closing online and stores what is the impact on quality and future support. More sharp keepers than I ever would have expected. Sony RX1R II review Sony's technological innovations continue to impress with its latest fixed-lens, full-frame camera By Amy Davies 29 February 2016 That’s a lovely shot. I can't see how it can't. >> putting long lenses on the a7R range is simply missing the point of the cameras IMHO. We find that, especially in a camera with an advanced autofocus system and no direct autofocus point controls, it would be helpful for a good amount of users. A marketing deception Sony line's of FF cameras suffer from, which seriously affects theoretical optimal performance of used components. The EVF is excellent, better than anticipated. Productprijs: € 4.199,-Pakketpost - Voor 23.59 besteld, morgen gratis thuisbezorgd! Two completely different shutter mechanisms. I’ve put together a roundup of, various types of its SteadyShot in-camera image stabilization, registered with the U.S. De lens van de Cyber-shot RX1R II heeft alle kenmerken van glas aan de bovenkant, waarbij het blauwe Zeiss-logo aan de zijkant één weggeefactie is. The new images shed light on how the canyon formed and help better our understanding of Mars. The problem with A7R II is that its fallacies only start with lens availability and cover many other aspect of a camera system.It will yet take Sony years to catch up with the competition though Sony is clearly moving in that direction but does not yet seem to get it right. The Powershot Zoom can't compete with pro cameras for image quality, though it sure does fit in your pocket. And if that weren't an option, I'd be looking at Fuji. Bend your knees and make like a human gimbal. A lot of it depends on the processing. That's an awfully big sensor that cannot be cleaned. But the autofocus system in the RX1R II isn't slow by any means. For that reason it negates the $1000 premium you are putting on the lens. Just look at studio comparison of RX1R II and A7R II. 5 DS R class. Despite some tough competition from Canon's excellent EOS R5, Sony's a7R IV remains at the top of the pack in our 'best camera for landscape photography' buying guide. UK - no one has a camera for me to asses. $250 is not irrelevant. Or is Sony just putting this camera even more out of range for most of us? Anyway, this test scene has positively no resemblance of the true IQ coming out of this camera. It is a high resolution camera that has to be treated almost like a "medium format" machine - careful framing, accurate focusing, stable hands or tripod. 42.4-effective-megapixel, 35 mm full-frame Exmor R® CMOS sensor, 399 focal plane phase-detection-point AF performance, retractable XGA OLED Tru-Finder™, optical variable low-pass filter and other features. Simply daft. The Sony Cyber-shot RX10 II keeps the 8.3x 24-200mm constant f2.8 zoom lens of the original Mark I, but upgrades the sensor to deliver 4k video and super slow motion options. Congress finally passes CASE to allow copyright holders to make small claims without resorting to costly legal processes via federal courts. Coulda, woulda, shoulda...". The battery though? If, like me, you rarely, if ever take your (Zeiss ZM 35mm f2.0 lens off the a7r in my case), then this camera is Heaven sent. I've just spent a week shooting with mine while trekking in the mountains - lovely landscape shots, with plenty of resolution and superb colours. I mostly use it wide or a couple of stops shy of wide. also buys you some of the same issues from the RX1R II's predecessors. The Sony Cyber-shot RX1R II is the latest in the company's line of compact, fixed-lens full-frame digital cameras. The viewfinder's also received an upgrade, the battery can be charged over USB, and the body remains weather-sealed. A fixed lens camera, by contrast, can basically never have it's sensor cleaned. In more dynamic situations, the fiddly buttons, dials, and menus would drive me crazy and cause me to miss a lot of opportunities. The maximum shutter speed if 1/4000 sec. So why use 42 megapixels sensor if the camera due to poor quality optics will never be able to use them?!! I'm sad to report that the experience of test driving a Leica Q has ruined every other camera on the market for me, including the X100F. We compare the new Sony Cyber-shot RX1R II with the Sony Cyber-shot RX1, and RX1R to see what new features the RX1R II brings to the RX Cyber-shot line-up. The comparison made here is maybe more interesting: https://www.dpreview.com/reviews/rx1r-ii-review/8. In fact, you'd be hard pressed to find a camera with better low light image quality. I usually shoot people.. wide-open, mostly between 1/160s and 1/250s and very few images are not tack sharp. The on-sensor PDAF system with face detection is excellent at accurately and smoothly tracking faces in video capture without hunting, and you can even plug in a microphone (but without a headphone port, you can't monitor it). It looks to me as if the variable low-pass filter was set to 'full' and that may explain the strange softness and lack of definition. I wonder if DPR could possibly clarify. I don't see any meaningful fall off in sharpness toward the edges at infinity. Anyway you dont have any real world comparisons and i dont know why. Absolutely. Makes me think if you dialed up a little more sharpness and contrast on the A7rii you might have a completely different story. To see that it is, you have to power on the camera and check that the small AC icon is showing up to the battery indicator on the LCD screen. Chris and Jordan tell us why it's a solid choice for many shooters. Is it a perfect camera. I don't have IS/VR worries like I used to with this camera. I have several old Sony Reel to Reel decks. I only have two fingers with firm grip on A7R II - very bad for holding camera with larger lenses (and you have to hold it with one hand when you operate other equipment or just to get into the menu or move obstacles).2) RX1R II. Sketch242 Since my RX100, also purchased in 2012, still works perfectly I am interested in that upgrade. Het voornaamste verschil is technisch: de RX1R heeft geen laagdoorlaatfilter voor de sensor. So basically Sony did not get any of these two cameras right for what they should be. It would be nice to have small LED charging indicator light on the camera itself (there is one on the dedicated battery charger). Obviously it all depends on what you call fast. I would like to update my post however. I think development of new tools for this camera is about the apps Sony can to sell you, and not to add functions with no reward. It's something like your tripod needs to be twice the weight of your camera? Is the manual focusing ring intuitive? It offers carry-everywhere, high-resolution full-frame image quality that’s bolstered by an impressive autofocus system and reasonable depth-of-field control from its 35mm F2 lens. (Source: Sony.) Photo by Barney Britton; ISO 125, 1/125 sec, F8, Photo by Barney Britton; ISO 100, 1/2000 sec, F2, The combination of accurate autofocus, a tilting screen and a leaf shutter make the RX1R II an excellent choice for low-profile shooting. http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/rx1r-ii-review/8. How many here even know this fact? Not that I would want to manually focus often, but still - not great. By the way I have Sony A7R II (RX1R II) and frankly am not happy with it on quite a few rather mundane angles including lack of good lens line up to match the competition. I have the A7Rii as well. Chromatic aberration is awful 13 micrometers. As for your brilliant statement about using different lenses on the A7R ii . I guess somebody had to do it. Like Olympus' OM-D line of cameras, we recommend taking some time to figure out exactly how you want to use the camera to achieve an optimal set up, and then leaving it that way. As we'd expect from a camera that basically looks like a bar of soap with a lens attached, handling is fairly straightforward. All buttons are customizable and there is a customizable function menu. It means that the corners in the test scene are not unsharp because the lens is soft. Of course that doesn't address the limitations of a $3300 fixed lens camera compared to the A7Rii. Autofocus is dependable in good light. I dont think the lens are interchangeable. Image cropped to taste. Just a better camera all around. On the other hand, the small size makes it tempting to use it one handed for quick snaps or street shooting, in the hope that the continuous AF with face recognition will take care of sharpness. Sony Cyber-shot RX1R Mark II Video - Visit http://www.ephotozine.com for sample photos, reviews, specifications, discussion and more. With Rx1rII you don't even have to care about that, because leaf shutter is silent enough.But for you.. anything less than ideal (like making any kind of adjustment between the shots or slowing down your own movement for 2 seconds) automatically turns the whole thing into "useless". You don't need a heavy tripod. If they left the same lens on 42 megapixel sensor then bad... Not enough. For the most part, I really really like it. So 42 megapixels beg for larger new G Master lenses that hopefully will resolve it fully. Sticking to what they do best will continue to benefit them. Basically, you can get flare if you are trying to, and you can easily avoid it if it isn't your thing. In this buying guide we've rounded-up several great cameras for travel and recommended the best. Unless you work extensively in nudist colonies, it's not a big deal.